If the county continues to collectresidential trash at current levels,landfills will soon be overflowingandparkland will need to be usedin orderto createmore space. Charging each householda feefor eachpound of trash it putsout forcollection will induce residents toreduce the amount of trashthey create; this charge willtherefore protect the remainingcounty parkland.
Which of thefollowing is an assumption made in drawing theconclusion above?
(A) Residents will reduce the amount oftrash they put out forcollection by reducing the numberof products they buy. (B) The collection fee willnot significantlyaffect the purchasing power ofmost residents, even if theirhouseholds do not reduce the amountof trashthey put out. (C) The collection fee willnot induceresidents to dump their trashin theparklands illegally. (D) The beauty of countyparkland is an important issuefor mostof thecounty's residents. (E) Landfills outside the county'sborders could be used asdumping sites for the county'strash.
解题： 这里我用的是先看问题后看原文的方法（经过自己测试，后一种更适合自己，觉得更有方向性）。 1.一看到问题，特别是蓝色背景中得drawing the conclusion, 我想那就得 找（读了一遍原文）conclusion： this charge will therefore protect the remaining county parkland. —这个应该是吧；接着从结论中提炼出了charge（也就是原文中的fee)protect parkland. 2.依据1中的推出的charge(fee)protect parkland在下面5个选项中提炼关键词如下 A.residents reduce trash by reducing the products they buy (其中一个关键词也没有)排除 B.fee won't affect purchasing power,even if they don't reduce trash(其中有只有fee)排除 C.fee won't induce residents to dump in parklands.(两个都有fee&parkland,关系也是not induce residents to dump in parklands=protect parklands) 为正解 D.beauty of parkland is important for residents(只有parkland）排除 E.landfills could be used as dumping site(什么也没有）排除
我是这么解的，主要是依据问题中得drawing the conclusion, 还有就是假设和结论比存在直接联系。 觉得OG的解释有点晦涩... ...郁闷中，希望大家对于CR难题还有什么巧解得方法跟大家分享一下 “你有一个苹果，我有一个苹果，彼此交换一下，我们仍然是各有一个苹果；但你有一种思想，我有一种思想，彼此交换，我们就都有了两种思想，甚至更多。”
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-12-13 05:04:40
,关系也是not induce residents to dump in parklands=protect parklands) 为正解
收藏
收藏
楼主
