ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (LEZS)

00:00:00

Low-income families are often unable to afford as much child care as they need. One government program would award low-income families a refund on the income taxes they pay of as much as $1,000 for each child under age four. This program would make it possible for all low-income families with children under age four to obtain more child care than they otherwise would have been able to afford.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the claim that the program would make it possible for all low-income families to obtain more child care?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1936|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 请帮忙看道逻辑题吧

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-12-31 21:13:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Low-income families are often unable to afford as much child care as they need. One government program would award low-income families a refund on the income taxes they pay of as much as $1,000 for each child under age four. This program would make it possible for all low-income families with children under age four to obtain more child care than they otherwise would have been able to afford.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the claim that the program would make it possible for all low-income families to obtain more child care?
(a) The average family with children under age four spends more than $1,000 a year on child care.
(b) Some low-income families in which one of the parents is usually available to care for children under age four may not want to spend their income tax refund on child care.
(c) The reduction in government revenues stemming from the income tax refund will necessitate cuts in other government programs, such as grants for higher education.
(d) Many low-income families with children under age four do not pay any income taxes because their total income is too low to be subject to such taxes. (B)
(e) Income taxes have increased substantially over the past 20 years, reducing the money that low-income families have available to spend on child care.

答案是B,我可以理解,可是D为什么不对呢?求分析,谢啦~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-1-1 21:12:31 | 只看该作者
d是说low income families do not pay any income tax,那么低收入家庭如果没有缴税,根据program(从收缴的所得税中退税),政府就不能给那些家庭refund(退税),从而不能激励父母增加照顾孩子的投入,so the program fail to make it possible for all low-income families to obtain more child care.所以,d选项错误!
板凳
发表于 2014-1-1 21:35:54 | 只看该作者
B 和 D 都削弱原文的结论,但注意 原文结论是对 all 低收入家庭都提高,但对于选项而言,D优于B,B只提及SOME,程度上削弱性不如 MANY!! 而且SOME 模棱两可,到底有多少,但总体上两个选项都能削弱原文结论。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2014-1-2 14:05:48 | 只看该作者
南蛮也爱球 发表于 2014-1-1 21:12
d是说low income families do not pay any income tax,那么低收入家庭如果没有缴税,根据program(从收缴的 ...

我泽呢么觉得你的推理结果应该是:D选项是正确答案。。。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-1-2 14:07:15 | 只看该作者
fxj25860 发表于 2014-1-1 21:35
B 和 D 都削弱原文的结论,但注意 原文结论是对 all 低收入家庭都提高,但对于选项而言,D优于B,B只提及SO ...

谢谢~这个分析我满意
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 06:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部