以下是引用lemonee在2003-9-12 10:01:00的发言: 第一题的A 是对的。 曾看到一个牛牛的话让我幡然醒悟,他说,strenthen 不是解释结论 而是附和结论。e答案解释了结论,但没有加强。 a 说:increse both can not changing the position.(this is feasible) ,那么increase one and low another ,the likelihood will increase 从而加强了结论。 does it make sense?
Hi emonee,
I don't quite agree with your explanation..I think E is the answer, below is my reason.
first, we should know what is the evidence and conclusion of the argument. evidence: 1. value of product= quality/price 2. the higher the value, the better will be its competitive position. conclusion: either increasing the quality or decreasing the price, customer will be likely to choose the product.
In the passage, we notice a GAP between evidence and conclusion: value of product and customer's choosing the product..We can not safely conclude that the higher the value, the more likely that customers will choose the product UNLESS we know that customer can identify the value correctly. In other words, IF customers can't make sure which product has higher value, how can we conclude that customers will surely choose the product with higher value?
a is incorrect because it simply repeat the meaning of evidence 1..without mentioning the relation between evidence and conclusion, it can not support the conclusion..
e is correct because it fill the GAP between evidence and conclusion..without E, the conclusion can not safey be drew. "the actual quality of the product" in choice is the same meaning of "the value of the product".
my two cents.
good luck!
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-12 21:56:53编辑过] |