- UID
- 808479
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-17
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
查到的讨论帖不多!实在不明白...便再来问问!!
It is illegal to advertise presceiption medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to presceibe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.
Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluste the argument?
B. Whether some people might got to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised.
E. Wheher physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired.
answer: E
手打 原谅只写这两个选项上来...我选了B。
我觉得没有B 我确实可能会选E的 但毕竟E是 当yes 只有在之前医生开的药不起作用的时候,医生会选择开广告药给病人 不算否定原文;当no 原文成立。
而B选项 当yes 有人直接来找医生开药 这就说明原文说的 “医生总有决定权,不适合的要不会开”相悖 否定原文; 当no 原文成立。
求指教!>O<
|
|