SOS OG-79

79.When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply,"NO." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

A Why does the part that replies not answer,"Yes"?

E Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

我是这样理解的

题目里说，被催眠以后的自我意识中，涉及DEAF和射击REPLY的是分开的。也就是说，selves of the subjuect是否deaf,与reply是无关的。这样结果应该是有答YES有答NO，是随机的。所以评价是应该注意这一点。我觉得如过像A那样评价是不科学的。因为如果所有都回答YES也同样是有逻辑缺陷的。

提问并回答“no”是客观事实，需要挑战的是那个解释-一半聋一半听得见。按这个解释，做出反应的应该是能听见的那部分，那做出的回答应该是“yes”，而事实上能听见的那部分回答“no”-好像是在替聋的那部分回答，这个问题是那个解释解决不了的，因此问为什么不回答“yes”就是指出了解释的荒谬性。这题要求的就是证伪这个解释，并不是要求你提出正确的解释。

好像明白点了。就是说答YES，直接反驳他。而E就有点远了。

谢了。