ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2630|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全19-13

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-3 22:49:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
大全-19-13.    Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clientsby promoting some coins as “extremely rare” when in fact those coins arerelatively common and readily available.
XYZagent: That is ridiculous. XYZ Coins is one of the largest coin dealers in theworld. We authenticate the coins we sell through a nationally recognized firmand operate a licensed coin dealership.
TheXYZ agent’s reply is most vulnerable to the criticism that it
(A) exaggerates the investigator’sa claims in order to make them appear absurd
(B) accuses the investigator ofbias but presents no evidence to support that accusation
(C) fails to establish that othercoin dealers do not also authenticate the coins those dealers sell
(D) lists strengths of XYZ Coinswhile failing to address the investigator’s chargeD
(E) provides no definition for theinherently vague phrase “extremely rare”
为什么不是E呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-5 01:33:43 | 只看该作者
顶,请牛人解答~
难道是因为D提到了failing to address the investigators charge这个经常出现的选项?
板凳
发表于 2011-9-11 10:17:08 | 只看该作者
问题问的是TheXYZ agent’s reply is most vulnerable to the criticism that it。。。。所以就要关注agent的回复。在他的回复中,只是列出了他们公司的优势而并没有针对指控作出解释。D选项很贴切。是不是extremely rare并没有什么关系,主要是在他们的回复中体现了什么才是正确答案。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-11 07:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部