- UID
- 1288684
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2017-7-5
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Compared with doctors who see patients only in their offices, doctors who see their patients in the patients` homes develop a more personal relationship with them. Their patients are also less likely to bring malpractice suits against them. This lower rate of malpractice suits clearly supports the common belief that having a close relationship with a doctor increases a patient`s willingness to give that doctor the benefit of the doubt when difficulties arise.
Which of the following, if true of doctors who make house calls, most seriously weakens the argument?
AThey are more likely than are doctors who do not make house calls to believe that a doctor`s bedside manner is an important part of medical treatment.
BThey see their patients more frequently than do doctors who do not make house calls and so acquire more information about the patients` conditions.
CThey tend to have fewer years of experience at practicing medicine than do doctors who do not make house calls.
DThey perform all the same types of treatment as doctors who do not make house calls.
EThey are not charged any less for malpractice insurance than are doctors who do not make house calls
Key:B
我的疑惑:
make phone call的医生到底是personal给予bedcare的医生还是普通的医生?
那这个phone call代表了啥?一大群医生总体中的子集吗?
假设make house call的医生是医生的一类。
如果要weaken原结论:closer relationship→less suit, 可以从1.他因导致(要体现“导致”) 2.减小差距——要体现在care上
我对B的理解:
B.more info:可以见病人更多次,也就等同于给予病人更多care,应该是strengthen呀?还是说,这道题就是在用2减小差距来做,如果phone call的医生是普通医生,那么常见+常打电话给病人→care↑, 诊断↑,suit↓?
感觉E更合适做正确答案?
减小了差距,phone call和没打电话的医生收到的charge一样多,也不就是缩小差距?还是说不能直接否定答案?
感觉自己的思路好像不太对...有大佬帮忙看看哪里不对劲吗.. ..... 感谢!
|
|