求助prep2 76

IVANNA · 发表于 2011-5-31 10:58:39

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
According to experts on shopping behavior, more shoppers would shop at Jerrod’s department store if they were offered the convenience of shopping carts. In fact, even if the amount spent by these additional customers only just covered the cost of providing the carts, providing carts would still probably increase Jerrod’s profits, since _______.
A. the layout of Jerrod’s is open enough to accommodate shopping carts comfortably
B. several department stores that compete with Jerrod’s have begun to make shopping carts available to their customers
C. there are some potential customers who would not be enticed to shop at Jerrod’s by the availability of shopping carts
D. stores that make shopping carts available to customers usually have to hire people to retrieve them from parking areas
E. a customer with a shopping cart buys more, on average, than a customer without a cart

我觉得C也很有道理

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2011-5-31 11:07:31

some = 1 or 100 out of 100.

If it is 100 out of 100, then the conclusion would not hold.

IVANNA · 发表于 2011-5-31 11:27:18

哦对对注意some 谢谢这么快就得到回复了

pennyrun · 发表于 2011-8-3 15:25:08

可以解释一下E为啥对吗？文中已经说了Infact, even if the amount spent by these additional customers only just coveredthe cost of providing the carts, 那么说顾客有车会买更多东西貌似没有什么意义啊?

balapupu · 发表于 2011-8-3 15:38:52

我觉得范围不同，一个是有车就来，没车就不来的顾客，一个是有车买的多，没车买的少的顾客。

pennyrun · 发表于 2011-8-3 15:47:39

WOW！真的~这个弯儿居然没转过来~~ 谢谢啦

balapupu · 发表于 2011-8-3 15:51:47

嘿嘿～～应该的啦～你的头像好有视觉冲击感哦～

pennyrun · 发表于 2011-8-3 16:00:22

I love piggy！

one1day · 发表于 2011-8-31 21:21:33

C说的是有些人不会被shopping carts引诱，他们是潜在的客源。但是原题提出的只是增加shopping carts，这些人不为所动，那就是加跟不加一样没变化，怎么可能增加收入呢？

E说的是，同一个人，给shopping carts就多买点，没这个就少买，所以，给他carts=提高profits

求助prep2 76

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()