OG12 Q104

tinahuang95 · 发表于 2011-10-24 19:10:55

有哪位大大能讲讲题么？我题目看了半天没看懂。。⊙﹏⊙b汗

specta · 发表于 2011-10-24 19:56:45

原文：

G这个地方开了家***打折店S***，大家觉得5年内，G的现有打折店都要关了（因为玩不过S）。尽管如此，关门的店铺的地方不久就肯定有新店开张。
因为：***不打折店C***开张后的5年内，那些因为玩不过C而关掉的店铺的地方，都每每开了新店。

让你weaken

关键在于：打折，不打折，饶半天

明白了？

tinahuang95 · 发表于 2011-10-24 23:15:46

哦不过我想问 S和C的关系是什么？

specta · 发表于 2011-10-25 00:12:09

出题人的 point is：他两没关系，或者说就是2个东西

tinahuang95 · 发表于 2011-10-25 00:22:27

哦好的~~明白了
谢谢哈

fdunan · 发表于 2011-10-25 15:29:48

这道题真他爷的太绕了。贴下原题：
104. Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a non-discount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.

(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.

(C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.

(D) Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.

(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.

fdunan · 发表于 2011-10-25 15:47:04

逻辑链：
虽然：SpendLess discount department store开业导致预计未来5年discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district将会关闭。但是（结论）：这些地方不会长期空置的。
为啥呢？（类比）因为在Colson's non-discount department store开业以来导致关闭的购物街，a new store也开业了。

问weaken？
要weaken结论（这些地方不会长期空置的），需要从推出结论的类比证据开刀。什么情况会说明在Colson's所在的购物街不会有新的竞争者(non-discount store)出现？
B）项，在Colson's所在的购物街新开的store是discount store，与Colson's不构成竞争关系。反过来就是说在Colson's所在的购物街，Colson's的竞争者并没有出现。从而weaken了结论。

我觉得要区分两类商店：discount store和non-discount store. 原论证就是那non-discount store过去5年的情况来推测discount store今后5年的情况。

OG12 Q104

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()