ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1005|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

不好意思~弱弱的问个阅读题~实在是让我纠结

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-22 16:42:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans.However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals:small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption.Krech also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene.Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere.But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence.White observes that Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.


Q6:

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?

A.Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed

B.New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct

C.Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras

D.Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed


E.New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

答案是B,我想问C不可以吗?因为K的观点是climate change 有可能导致extinction, 而按C说, 在P时代以前就出现了climate change, 但却没有extinction,不也是weaken吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-8-22 17:10:34 | 只看该作者
题目说的是weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory,而黄线前面这句“White observes that Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and【 Krech】, 【though】 aware that the dates are controversial, 【does not challenge them】”特别指出了krech虽然意识到日期有争议但是并没有challenge them,也就不是objection
板凳
发表于 2011-8-22 17:19:49 | 只看该作者
我也刚做了这道题。。。和lz一样选c了。。。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-22 17:26:24 | 只看该作者
题目说的是weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory,而黄线前面这句“White observes that Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and【 Krech】, 【though】 aware that the dates are controversial, 【does not challenge them】”特别指出了krech虽然意识到日期有争议但是并没有challenge them,也就不是objection
-- by 会员 chasebetter (2011/8/22 17:10:34)

可是我觉得C选项的climate change表明的时间和文中说的日期争议不是一个意思啊。。。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-22 17:26:43 | 只看该作者
我也刚做了这道题。。。和lz一样选c了。。。。
-- by 会员 lotus213yu (2011/8/22 17:19:49)

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-22 18:28:46 | 只看该作者
顶啊!
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-22 19:34:21 | 只看该作者
顶~
8#
发表于 2011-8-22 20:09:36 | 只看该作者
有讨论稿……大家得出的结论是这不是一道严谨的题目,LZ不必纠结……
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-22 20:16:44 | 只看该作者
有讨论稿……大家得出的结论是这不是一道严谨的题目,LZ不必纠结……
-- by 会员 bitieming (2011/8/22 20:09:36)

哦,是这样,很感谢!
10#
发表于 2011-8-22 21:33:31 | 只看该作者
有讨论稿……大家得出的结论是这不是一道严谨的题目,LZ不必纠结……
-- by 会员 bitieming (2011/8/22 20:09:36)


哦,是这样,很感谢!
-- by 会员 傻熊有傻福 (2011/8/22 20:16:44)



C只说在那个era以前和以后都发生过climatic change,但并没有说这个change是否造成了extinction,楼主是自己给它加上了假设这种change没造成extinction,但选项没体现这一点啊,如果也发生了extinction呢?那不就变成支持了,我当时做这个文章的时候是这么想的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-4 09:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部