- UID
- 616296
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-17
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.
Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?
A:Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B:This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C:This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D:The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E:More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university. |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-5-23 15:21:07
收藏
收藏
