46. (33987-!-item-!-188;#058&007200)
Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did. (B) At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found. (C) The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction. (D) The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers. (E) The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned. 这题做对了~~~但是刚才翻了一下以前的旧帖~~发现有人认为C选项也可以加强~~~我当时首先把C就排除了~~现在看看怎么觉得也有道理~~
请NN帮助解答呀!!!
还有,个人认为A貌似也有点道理~~由于一些trade goods早于traders到达,所以trade goods的到达日期肯定早于1620`s,因此可以根据camps没有发现trade goods,而推断camps不晚于1630~~~是不是由于A中的some削弱了加强作用呢?
疑惑多多!!盼望解答!
|