- UID
- 89001
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2005-4-30
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
沙发
楼主 |
发表于 2011-7-10 10:47:53
|
只看该作者
Is it better for a group or an organization to make a specific decision by everyone in the team? The proposal of the issue that giving one member the central authority will hurt the work efficiency sounds reasonable. However, tempting as much as it is, it is hardly true. The author fail to consider what consequences can be caused due to this suggestion. I strongly disagree this point of view and my reasons can be listed as follows.
In the first place, not everyone in the world has the ability to handle a rather complicated condition or a complex project. People have their own characteristics, which make them be more suitable for specific position. For example, a wife who is good at following her husband's suggestions may perform housework well when her husband tells her what to do and what not to do. However, she might feel lost if her husband is absent and no one will tell her what she could do for the dinner. Obviously, the wife can show better talent when she receive the conducts than when she has to make her decision by herself.
In the second place, it is unlikely that a decision can be made by a team in which without a group leader. People have their own ideas and point of views. In most cases, they can not reach unanimous agreements. Additionally, it is difficult to tell who is right and who is wrong because the view of each person has its own advantages. Therefore, a chaos will probably disrupt the team and make everyone blame on others, which is bad for the solidarity of a group. However, if there is a group leader who can make the final decision, the argument on a project can be reconciled more easily.
In the third place, given that every individual will feel more encourage when he or she can be involved in an important decision and thus can finish the work more carefully, it is not likely that the work can be done effectively. More members in a group, more ideas are needed to be handled in order to make a final decision, which is time consuming. Thus, after the members of the group decide what to do, they probably waste too much time to finish the job no matter how hard they try their best to exert it.
Admittedly, the issue which point out the importance of teamwork and the share of responsibilities may have some reasons because it considers the central authority can hurt the effectiveness of a certain job. However, the advantages of giving everyone the right to make decisions can not outweigh its disadvantages since more argue will be generated and more time will be needed to solve this problem.
In short, the issue that groups and organizations should function as teams so that everyone should be involved when a decision is made, and that central authority can not get the job done effectively is unwarranted. I contend that every team or organization should delegate a group leader who can make the final decision. |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-7-10 10:47:36
收藏
收藏
