ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1009|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道GWD!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-12 11:52:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion?

A.    A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
B.    A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home
C.    The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.
D.    Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.
E.    Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-12 11:53:24 | 只看该作者
答案是A可是我感觉应该是E。请高人指点~~
板凳
发表于 2011-7-12 12:12:38 | 只看该作者
我这样想的哈 BCD你不纠结了 E我觉得有weaken的效果啊, 因为结论是说general 的比例要高于30%, 如果是E的话, 是说动物园工作人员不穿保护的gear, 言下之意是他们比起general population 更有可能得这个allergies, 所以是weaken 了conclusion.
所以就是A了 A应该是说那些患了严重allergies的工作人员都换工作了 也即是这部分人都变成了general population 的一部分了, 也就说明比例会高于30%
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 09:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部