Although custom prosthetic bone replacements produced through a new computer-aided design process will cost more than twice as much as ordinary replacements, custom replacements should still be cost-effective. Not only will surgery and recovery time be reduced, but custom replacements should last longer, thereby reducing the need for further hospital stays.
Which of the following must be studied in order to evaluate the argument presented above?
OG12-108Although custom prosthetic bone replacements produced through a new computer-aided design process will cost more than twice as much as ordinary replacements, custom replacements should still be cost-effective. Not only will surgery and recovery time be reduced, but custom replacements should last longer, thereby reducing the need for further hospital stays. Which of the following must be studied in order to evaluate the argument presented above?
A. The amount of time a patient spends in surgery versus the amount of time spent recovering from surgery
B. The amount by which the cost of producing custom replacements has declined with the introduction of the new technique for producing them
C. The degree to which the use of custom replacements is likely to reduce the need for repeat surgery when compared with the use of ordinary replacements
D. The degree to which custom replacements produced with the new technique are more carefully manufactured than are ordinary replacements
E. The amount by which custom replacements produced with the new technique will drop in cost as the production procedures become standardized and applicable on a larger scale
答案是C。。。 但是B是不是也有点道理啊。。。 B. The amount by which the cost of producing custom replacements has declined with the introduction of the new technique for producing them 是不是说生产cunstom replacement的成本因为新技术的引用已经下降了?
A reduction in cost does not necessarily make the new replacement COST-EFFECTIVE. For example, the new replacement cost $100 in the beginning, then was reduced to $10. Impressive, right? However, the old cost only cost about $1. Which one is more cost-effective?