ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3027|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

怎么判断一道逻辑题是因果关系还是果因关系?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-14 18:51:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
求助
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-14 19:05:17 | 只看该作者
Since the mayor's publicity campaign for Greenville's bus service began six months ago, morning automobile traffic into the midtown area of the city has decreased seven percent. During the same period, there has been an equivalent rise in the number of persons riding buses into the midtown area. Obviously, the mayor's publicity campaign has convinced many people to leave their cars at home and ride the bus to work.

像这道题,我认为是因果结构,因为在文中先说了原因后说了结果。但老师说是果因结构,他的意思是这段话先说了结果后说了原因,很困惑,因为开头有个since, 应该先说的是原因。求助?
板凳
发表于 2011-6-14 21:16:07 | 只看该作者
Do you know the main conclusion of this argument?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-14 22:51:12 | 只看该作者
yes, I know.  Conclusion: 乘公车的人增加了,和开车的人减少了。Reason: Mayor's publicity.

   我认为这道题的逻辑关系应该是: Mayor's publicity→Bus: Increase; Automobile: decrease.
但老师讲的逻辑关系是: Bus: Increase; Automobile: decrease←Mayor's publicity。我不理解为什么这道题是老师讲的那种果因结构,而不是我认为的那种因果结构? 因为在文中开头先说的是Since the mayor's publicity campaign, 然后才说的是结论。
谢谢
5#
发表于 2011-6-14 23:54:12 | 只看该作者
What you show is just the facts. And the word Since does not introduce a premise in this case. It simply introduce a time constraint. Since = During the period subsequent to the time when; not because

The word Obviously is an indicator for conclusion. So the sentence following Obviously is the main conclusion of the argument: the mayor's publicity campaign has convinced many people to leave their cars at home and ride the bus to work.

It is pointless to argue about 因果关系 or 果因关系 without a clear understanding of the premise and the main conclusion of the argument.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-15 16:24:59 | 只看该作者
明白了,非常感谢。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-12 07:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部