[求助]FF的一道经典假设题、FeiFei-31，FeiFei-32

FF 135 31,32
Political opinions and analyis outside the mainstream rarely are found on television talk shows, and it might be thought that this state of affeirs is a product of the political agendaof the television atstions themselves. In fact, television ststions are driven by the same economic forces as sellers of more tangible goods. Because they must attempt to ca[ture the largest possible share of the television ordience for their shows, they air only those shows that will appear to  large number of people. As a result, political opinions and analysis aired on relevision talk ahows are typically bland and innocuous.

31  An assumption made in the explanation offered by the author of the passage is that

A  most television views cannot agree on which elements of a particular opinion or analysis are most distrubing.

B  there are television viewers who might refuse to watch television talks shows that they know would be controversial and disturbing.  

C  each television viewers holds some opinions that is outside the political mainstream, but thoes opinions are not the same for everyone.

D  there are television shows on which economic forces have an even greater impact than they do on television talk shows.

E  the television talk shows of different stations resembles one another in most respects.

32  The explanation offered by the author of the passage makes the assumption that

A  television station executives usually lack a political agende of their own

B  bland and innocuous political opinions and analyses are generally in the mainstream

C  political analysts outside the mainstream are relatively indifferent to the effect their analyses have on television views

D  most television viewers are prepared to argue against the expression of political opinions and analyses with which they disagree

E  the political opinions of television station xecutives are not often reflected in the television shows their stations produce

这两题是大假设里套小假设，31题是EXPLANATION 中包含的假设 ，32题是EXPLANATION依据的假设，但理不清题干中的逻辑层次关系,两个假设就把我搅糊涂了。请各位指点以下

谢谢NN指点

我只是根据题目字面意思认为有两个假设，但自己只能推出一个假设，所以很迷惑。原来这是一个问题的两种形式，大概想考察我们的改写转换能力吧

. In fact, television ststions are driven by the same economic forces as sellers of more tangible goods. Because they must attempt to ca[ture the largest possible share of the television ordience for their shows, they air only those shows that will appear to  large number of people

这上面的是作者的解释，也就是31题提问所针对的内容：作者的解释中包含了什么假设。

一读完题，我就想找”sellers of more tangible goods“的选项为答案，可是没有。

但是我发现了32题的提问和31题一模一样，没有任何区别。从答案判断：题目真正想问的是——文章的结论基于以下何种假设？

好晕啊！！！！

以下是引用mba174在2004-12-12 0:45:00的发言：
31题，我承认B有道理， 但为什么不选C呢？

C 取非， 大家的观点关于outside the political mainstream如果一致的话， 电视就会播Political opinions and analyis outside the mainstream，那作者的解释不就行不通了吗?

急救！！

非常同意楼上的话，同样的疑问。~

 each television viewers holds some opinions that is outside the political mainstream

这句话本身假设就过分了，   完全可以有人只赞同主流意见。

C 选项本身可以作为一个解释， 但是不必要

两道题都选B。原文大意是，非主流的政治观点和分析很少出现在television talk show中，原因是电视台被经济利益驱使着一定要争取到最大的观众人数，他们只播放可以吸引大量观众的节目。因此television talk show中的政治观点和分析一般都是平庸和无毒无害的。第一道题的假设是说有些电视观众会拒绝看有争议和颠覆性的节目。这个很明显是原文为了争取最大观众数量而播放平庸无毒的节目的假设。第二道题假设答案B是说平庸和无毒无害的节目是主流。这个是对应原文说非主流的很少出现，出现的都是平庸的无毒无害的同意表述。