ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8346|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[AWA模板] 一战香港770,回馈CD--分享作文模板

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-23 23:05:00 | 只看该作者

一战香港770,回馈CD--分享作文模板

从对Gmat 完全没有了解,到921号考,只有1个月天时间,加上我本身作对冲基金,平时难得时间静下心来复习,CD对我帮助很大,让我快速掌握复习策略。多谢!有效的复习策略非常重要,我的体会是OG->CD Prep 破解语法-->涛涛数学--〉模考---JJ数学+阅读,考前准备个好的模板,特别是Argument

 

当然,每个人情况不一样,我个人本来英语不错,女朋友又是纯美国人,所以有些优势,但是我觉得我上面说得大方向没有错。另外附上我的模板供大家参考

In this argument, the arguer concludes/claims that…. The author cites…..as an example in support of his recommendation. Furthermore, he also assume that…….At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be somewhat appealing, but thorough examination reveals that the argument is problematic because of several critical flaws that are discussed below.

 

Firstly, the argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that++++ However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support it. The arguer fails to take into account other factors that might contribute to the result that++++It is likely that++++++It is also likely that ++++. Any of thee scenarios, if true, would show that++++. Therefore, this argument in question should not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility that++++++

 

(Secondly, even if ++++++, the argument relies on an additional assumption that….Offered in the argument, the only evidence is that++++++. Lacking the firm support, it might be the case that+++++, if so, it turns out that++++++. It may also be the possible that +++++. Since the author fails to account for these possibilities, he or she can’t convince us of the assertion that ………., let alone the groundless conclusion)

 

Secondly, the argument commits the logical fallacy of “after this, therefore because of this”. In no case can the mere fact that +++++ be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesn’t necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative factors such as++++, or +++ that may contribute to a certain extent of B. It may be only a coincidence that+++++. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to+++++, this assumption in question can’t be accepted.

 

Thirdly, the argument has also committed the fallacy of false analogy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all aspects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. No evidence is provided to support this assumption. However, there are all kinds of important differences between +++ and +++, making the analogy less than valid. For example, A++++, however, B++++. Thus lacking this assumption, the conclusion is entirely unfounded.

 

Fourthly, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that ++++ is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.

 

Last but not least, the validity of the survey on which the argument relies is dubious in itself. The survey cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim doesn’t indicate who conducted the survey and when and how the survey is conducted, neither does it mention the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered, the results of this survey are worthless as evidence to support that+++++

 

Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidence for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense and observation tell us that joining A and B might produce better results.

 

In conclusion, this argument, while seemingly well-supported at first, has several flaws as discussed above. Hence it is unacceptable and not persuasive as it stands. It could be substantiated by providing more solid evidence that++++++. In addition, to further bolster the conclusion, the arguer should furnish a demonstration concerning+++++++. Without additional evidence, I am not convinced that ++++++++.

The issue of whether ++++ is a complex and controversial and its validity depends on a variety of factors. On one hand, many people may feel; on the other hand, others may think++++ In my opinion, however,++++++. My view will be greatly confirmed by the following discussion

 

The main reason for my view is that+++++. A good example may be found in the case of+++. Under this circumstance, it is obvious that…. There is no better example than this to illustrate the strength/weakness of ……..Also, +++++. Finally, ++++

 

Another reason for my view is+++. The rationale is not far to seek. To illustrate, let’s consider the +++. Hence,

 

Some might argue ….Admittedly, it may be true in some conditions. However, this alone doesn’t constitute a sufficient support to ++++. When the advantage and disadvantages of X and Y are carefully weighed, it is obvious to see++

 

In sum, I agree that ….However, it is generally not the most important one…..; Given the reasons discussed above, which sometimes intertwine to form an organic whole and thus become more persuasive, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that

沙发
发表于 2009-9-23 23:25:00 | 只看该作者
恭喜楼主啦!!谢谢!!
板凳
发表于 2009-10-9 18:03:00 | 只看该作者
非常好的模板,谢谢!
地板
发表于 2009-10-13 21:42:00 | 只看该作者
多谢lz分享
5#
发表于 2009-10-22 22:16:00 | 只看该作者
very logical argument model, thanks for sharing ~
6#
发表于 2009-11-26 14:59:59 | 只看该作者
今天一战760。作文完全就抄你老的模板上了,但愿不要被判低分啊,观世音菩萨如来佛祖保佑!
7#
发表于 2009-11-26 16:29:18 | 只看该作者
标记
8#
发表于 2010-4-29 08:47:31 | 只看该作者
这是目前我见过的最好的模板
9#
发表于 2010-6-12 07:59:12 | 只看该作者
应该是AA和AI的综合吧,我看到AI好像简单了点,AA把七宗全概括了,顶。
楼主辛苦了
10#
发表于 2011-5-4 22:32:28 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 20:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部