ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2302|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助 大全 Test19-15 谢谢~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-2 11:23:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
15.Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.

(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.

(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.

(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.C

(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

是说要削弱paleontologists的看法么 C怎么看出来了呀 他只说没有一个area能同时存在超过3种相似的 和把这标本分成16种有什么关系呢
谢谢各位啦~O(∩_∩)O
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-5-2 11:48:21 | 只看该作者
If C is true, then "[n]o geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time." If so, the "the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time" would be a big liability since these 11 species should belong to no more than 3 triceratops. Thus, the paleontologists' classification using these "11" species is wrong!

A enables the conclusion.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-2 12:07:45 | 只看该作者
to #1
Thank you very much!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-5 11:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部