求教各位大神一道题

scottshen · 发表于 2012-9-10 20:29:12

In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?B

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.

(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.

(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.（B）

(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.
感觉题目理解的不是很明白，请各位大牛给讲解下，感激不尽啊！！！

白菜白菜 · 发表于 2012-9-11 09:13:14

题目的意思是说第三个候选人介入是不公平的，因为他们吸引的人是本来要投票给其他两个候选人的，也就是挖了别人墙角嘛~

然后问你下面哪个是从题干推出的，B说如果第三者出现前，且其他两大党的投票者人数相等，则这两党没有哪一个能获得一半以上的票数。那也就是加起来总数少了，少的这部分人被第三者吸引走了，符合题干的描述~

scottshen · 发表于 2012-9-15 21:29:01

哦哦，明白了，多谢！

求教各位大神一道题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()