ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6111|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道JJ, 大家讨论讨论. (真题)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-19 14:58:00 | 只看该作者

一道JJ, 大家讨论讨论. (真题)

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances.     A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”     The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
    fficeffice" />
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?



C The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
E         The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.


which one is answer ?


沙发
发表于 2004-3-19 18:33:00 | 只看该作者
我选C。因为答案说,州法凌驾与地方法之上。州法又不如地方法严厉。应该不能算extending the local ordiances statewide. 相反应该是diminish the power of local ordiance statewide.


不知道对不对。


    

板凳
发表于 2004-3-19 18:56:00 | 只看该作者
同意C

地板
发表于 2004-3-19 19:32:00 | 只看该作者
I prefer C. C说明了国家法律可以取代地方法律. extending local ordinances statewide相对. 个人意见fficeffice" />
5#
发表于 2004-3-20 14:10:00 | 只看该作者
能不能把所有答案都写出来
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-20 15:12:00 | 只看该作者
有牛人说是E, 我也不懂的说.
7#
发表于 2004-3-20 15:37:00 | 只看该作者
呵呵,E没道理
8#
发表于 2004-3-21 00:01:00 | 只看该作者
请翻译一下,行吗?
9#
发表于 2004-3-21 03:54:00 | 只看该作者
怎么我觉得c也是怪怪的?
10#
发表于 2004-3-21 12:04:00 | 只看该作者
郁闷,整个题目单词都认识,意思看不懂,尤其最后一句和问题,能否请翻译一下,谢谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-7 03:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部