ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 15266|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD28-Q9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-4 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

GWD28-Q9

9. GWD28-Q9:

Early in the twentieth century, Lake
                Konfa
became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A.    Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

B.    Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.

C.    There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake
                Konfa
.

D.    Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

E.     The species of fish that are present in Lake
                Konfa
now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

请问A怎么错了?

沙发
发表于 2009-9-4 15:26:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得A属于无关选项

板凳
发表于 2009-9-4 15:27:00 | 只看该作者
选C么
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-4 17:34:00 | 只看该作者
A为什么无关?求解释
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-6 11:59:00 | 只看该作者
up
6#
发表于 2009-9-14 15:40:00 | 只看该作者
题中关注的是这个pipeline,逻辑是technology可以阻止pipeline形成的污染,与其他new industrial development around the lake,无关
7#
发表于 2009-12-29 16:54:37 | 只看该作者
是选B吧
8#
发表于 2009-12-29 16:54:57 | 只看该作者
assumption的题目经常用not来补充条件
9#
发表于 2010-8-17 08:02:32 | 只看该作者
把老题顶出来 想问一下C为什么不对 GWD给的答案是B 但是我觉的C更贴近 C说没有其他原因会导致这个technology失效么
??????  求大侠解释一下
10#
发表于 2010-8-27 09:04:13 | 只看该作者
把老题顶出来 想问一下C为什么不对 GWD给的答案是B 但是我觉的C更贴近 C说没有其他原因会导致这个technology失效么
??????  求大侠解释一下
-- by 会员 lmf0801 (2010/8/17 8:02:32)


个人觉得C不是在assumption,更像在加强而且很主观的说
c翻译过来,是说没有理由去相信当在那个湖里安装管道的时候,防泄露的技术是不有效地。
不知道楼上能理解吗?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 16:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部