ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8461|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 51

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-18 08:33:00 | 只看该作者

OG 51

51. It can be inferred from the passage that the isotope record taken from ocean sediments would be less useful to
researchers if which of the following were true?
(A) It indicated that lighter isotopes of oxygen predominated at certain times.
(B) It had far more gaps in its sequence than the record taken from rocks on land.
(C) It indicated that climate shifts did not occur every 100,000 years.
(D) It indicated that the ratios of oxygen 16 and oxygen 18 in ocean water were not consistent with those found in
fresh water.
(E) It stretched back for only a million years.


record taken from rocks.
A describes a circumstance that is in fact true, since oxygen 16 is the lighter isotope and,
according to the passage, “Almost all the oxygen in water is oxygen 16”(line 17). This fact clearly
has not compromised the usefulness of the ocean’s isotopic record as an indicator of climatic shifts.
Likewise, E would not diminish its usefulness, since isotopic records showing “fluctuations in
global ice volume over the past several hundred thousands years” have been sufficient to
determine a meaningful pattern (lines 49-53). If C were shown to be true, Milankovitch’s theory
would be weakened, but this would not diminish the value of the isotopic record. If D were true,
researchers would need to accommodate the inconsistency described in evaluating the isotopic
record, but, again, this would not compromise the usefulness of the record itself.


还是不懂D为什么不可以??

沙发
发表于 2004-11-18 12:35:00 | 只看该作者

If D were true, researchers would need to accommodate the inconsistency described in evaluating the isotopic
record, but, again, this would not compromise the usefulness of the record itself

大致意思是:如果D成立的话,则海水和淡水的O同位素比例存在the inconsistency (不一致),那么这种不一致肯定需要科学家进一步accommodate(解释)了。但即便如此,这种海水和淡水的不同(以及对这种不同所进行的解释)不会对the usefulness of the record (同位素记录本身的有效性)产生不利影响。

也就是说,即便真有不同,海洋沉积物的同位素记录仍可以对了解冰川周期带来帮助,而且并不会因为海水、淡水的同位素比例不同而降低海洋沉积物的同位素记录的这种有效性。因为选项中"海水、淡水的同位素比例不同"和题目中“降低海洋沉积物的同位素记录的有效性”这两个命题之间无关

板凳
发表于 2005-6-14 14:55:00 | 只看该作者
多谢大牛。
地板
发表于 2005-9-1 05:19:00 | 只看该作者
可 是 我 怎 么 觉 得 这 根 本 是 无 关 选 项 呢 。 因 为 这 里 只 是 海 水 和 海 水 比呀 。和 淡 水 同 不 同 , 有 关 吗 ? 科 学 家 有 必 要 为 了 这 个 课 题 解 释 这 一 点 吗 ? 多 谢   
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-1 5:21:27编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-9-3 21:39:00 | 只看该作者

自 己 顶

6#
发表于 2005-9-9 10:38:00 | 只看该作者
UP
7#
发表于 2005-10-6 20:16:00 | 只看该作者

幫你叫聲好,這題我也被困擾好久

8#
发表于 2006-3-1 04:43:00 | 只看该作者

我也是看到fresh water就果断排除D的,何况关于isotope record的advantages是定位于第三段,其中半点也没有提到什么淡水。


It can be inferred from the passage that the isotope record taken from ocean sediments would be less useful to researchers if which of the following were true?
(注意题干中的useful等同于原文第三段中的advantages,即如果怎样,isotope record就变得没什么作用了。)


因此,正确答案应该是将原文中的两个advantages之一做一个取非/同义变换


原文:Second, it is a more continuous record than that taken from rocks on land.


选项:It had far more gaps in its sequence than the record taken from rocks on land.



[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-1 4:48:09编辑过]
9#
发表于 2006-3-3 01:10:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用juh在2006-3-1 4:43:00的发言:

我也是看到fresh water就果断排除D的,何况关于isotope record的advantages是定位于第三段,其中半点也没有提到什么淡水。


It can be inferred from the passage that the isotope record taken from ocean sediments would be less useful to researchers if which of the following were true?
(注意题干中的useful等同于原文第三段中的advantages,即如果怎样,isotope record就变得没什么作用了。)


因此,正确答案应该是将原文中的两个advantages之一做一个取非/同义变换


原文:Second, it is a more continuous record than that taken from rocks on land.


选项:It had far more gaps in its sequence than the record taken from rocks on land.




嗯,觉得你的这个定位方法特别好

10#
发表于 2006-7-23 22:46:00 | 只看该作者

Line 30-33那段话怎么理解“there is remarkably little variation in isotope ratios in sedimentary specimens taken from different continental locations.”是说“同位素的比例在各个样本中都是一样”吗?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-12 04:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部