ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Brochure: Help conserve our city's water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner's yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4209|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道GWD的题~~~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-24 00:58:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
后天二战了,5555,向各位大虾请教一道不懂得题~~~~ 谢谢指点~~~~~

为什么答案是B呢? 我选的D
Brochure:Help conserve our city’s water supply.By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.


Criticism:For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.


Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?


  1. Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
  2. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
  3. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
  4. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
  5. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-11-24 03:22:19 | 只看该作者
我的理解如下,刚刚开始复习,看到你的题顺便做下,仅供参考.



Criticism:For most people with yards, thesavings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify theexpense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less thantwenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
(disagree to convert to water-conserving landscap, concern focus on economically )

Which ofthe following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of thecriticism?
(
要反对Criticism,也就是说要找那个方面water-conserving conventional省钱)

  1. Even homeowners whose yards do not have     water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving     devices in their homes.
  2. A conventional landscape generally requires a much     greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a     water-conserving landscape.conventional landscapefertilizer&herbicide方面比较贵,water-conserving 便宜
  3. A significant proportion of the residents of the     city live in buildings that do not have yards.
  4. It costs no more to put in water-conserving     landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.water-conservingconventional需要的钱一样,不能说明water-conserving就好
  5. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their     yards than they use for all other purposes combined.
板凳
发表于 2010-11-24 20:58:38 | 只看该作者
重点在Criticism 所说的WATER BILL
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-25 18:43:19 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上二位!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 01:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部