Kitchen magazine plans to license the use of its name by a line of cookware. For a magazine, licensing the use of its name for products involves some danger, since if the products disappoint consumers, the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising. However, experts have evaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen. Therefore, Kitchen can collect its licensing fee without endangering its other revenues.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
下来是裸机。。。在介绍下情况,一篇GWD基本也就是2-3多一点3-4个。其实,裸机AND月读属于一种类型,绝对的少数精英注意。。。。有时候只要你把握住关键词汇、掌握住范围,弄清楚裸机关联,甚至不用读懂题都可以(仅针对架桥型的题目,可以不用读懂)。。。。 找出具体关键词汇,找对主要对象,文章所表示出的关系是什么。然后你就知道改选神马了。。。。弄个例题解释: One year ago a local government initiated an antismoking advertising campaign in local newspapers which it financed by imposing a tax on cigarettes of 20 cents per pack。 One year later the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes had declined by 3 percent。 Clearly what was said in the advertisements had an effect, although a small one on the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes. 6 M- U& S0 T8 F Which one of the following, if true, most helps to strengthen argument? ( I0 {: a6 u& j b9 e, |, g/ L (A) Residents of the locality have not increased their use of other tobacco products such as snuff and chewing tobacco since the campaign went into effect ' p9 E: h" Q6 t2 ]7 J (B) A substantial number of cigarette smokers in the locality who did not quit smoking during the campaign now smoke less than they did before it began % D: [! `/ B q( O' U (C) Admissions to the local hospital for chronic respiratory ailments were down by 15 percent one year after the campaign began 4 f5 i4 E) y" l6 l5 K* |* q (D) Merchants in the locality responded to the local tax by reducing the price at which they sold cigarettes by 20 cents per pack (E) Smokers in the locality had incomes that on average were 25 percent lower than those of nonsmokers * |' @' V; f- l1 Z8 N C' U/ Z" g 注意本题的对象:分别是“advertisement”AND“吸烟人数”,然后关系是“因为AD所以吸烟人数少了”。。。。然后一一分析选项: A,提到本地人数,而不是吸烟人数,AD干脆没有出现,相对提到了文章中没有的“活动”,另外选项中其他选项与两个要求对象边都不沾,故而无关。 B,虽然提到了“吸烟人民(注意是人民而不是人数)”AND“AD所引起的活动”但是针对对象不是人数减少,二是抽烟的抽的少了,是程度而不是人数,故而无关。 C,没有吸烟人数,没有AD,只有医院,虽然说可能可以由关联推出来,但是没有反应对象,还有过度推理现象,所以无关。 D,虽然没有提到对象,但是,这属于SUPPORT的一种思路,排除他因。所以加强SUPPORT E,没钱,那就别抽烟,没钱又不是发生在广告后。无关。