求助：旧prep CR test 2--65(34047-!-item-!-188;#058&007611)

改变自己ggcc · 发表于 2010-8-8 16:27:10

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

(A) The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.
(B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.
(C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.
(D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.
(E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

想问第二句话是何意思~一直没有参透懂~请大牛赐教~

rabbitbear · 发表于 2010-10-20 21:04:02

我不是大牛QQ~不過我在想是不是這樣翻

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease.
藉由預防腦溢血和心臟病高血壓的治療預先阻止了某些醫療上的開銷。

Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population.
但是由此省下來的總金額(應該是之前省下來的開銷)只有治療高血壓所需的開銷的四分之一。

Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.
所以預防高血壓的治療是沒有經濟效益的!

不知道這樣翻對不對.....?

求助：旧prep CR test 2--65(34047-!-item-!-188;#058&007611)

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()