ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1472|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD21-40

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-17 22:19:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
40. GWD31-40

A shortage of orders for Manto Aircraft’s airliners has led analysts topredict that the manufacturer will have to lay off workers, the new order thatconsolidated airlines has just madefor 20 of Manto’s model TX jets does not provide a reason for the analysts torevise their predictions, because simultaneously with its new order, consolidated canceled its existing order foran equal number of manto’slarger, moreexpensive model Z jets.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


A.     Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractorsto provide the labor to manufacture the model Z than it does the model TX

B.     The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture themodel Z are not proficient at manufacturing the model TX

C.     Manto includes all required maintenance work forthe first five years in the price of each jet it sells

D.     Manto has had to lay off workers several times within thepast ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when itsubsequently received new orders

E.      A large number of the airliners in consolidated fleet areat the beginning of their expected service life

我也觉得A不对,但不理解为什么C对,求指教,谢谢啦!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-18 13:58:02 | 只看该作者
UP
板凳
发表于 2010-10-18 17:22:50 | 只看该作者
我怎么觉得A正确啊~~~
题干意思就是:
premise: M 签下了20个 TX的合同 但 取消了 20个 Z的合同
conclusion: 专家预测 M 会裁员

weaken:如果20个Z大部分都外包,取消他对 工厂人力需求不大
因此,加20个M需要的labor 比 减20个Z 裁掉的labor多
所以 会裁员的说法不成立
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-19 15:42:52 | 只看该作者
我跟LS的想法是一样的。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 00:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部