ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2249|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-2-4-24,LSAT-10-4-25

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-12 15:51:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-2-4-24,LSAT-10-4-25

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act, the United States automobile industry argued that meeting the act’s standards for automobile emissions was neither economically feasible nor environmentally necessary. However, the catalytic converter, invented in 1967, enabled automakers to meet the 1970 standards efficiently. Currently, automakers are lobbying against the government’s attempt to pass legislation that would tighten restrictions on automobile emissions. The automakers contend that these new restrictions would be overly expensive and unnecessary to efforts to curb air pollution. Clearly, the automobile industry’s position should not be heeded.



24.   Which one of the following most accurately expresses the method used to counter the automakers’ current position?



(A) The automakers’ premises are shown to lead to a contradiction.



(B) Facts are mentioned that show that the automakers are relying on false information.



(C) A flaw is pointed out in the reasoning used by the automakers to reach their conclusion.



(D) A comparison is drawn between the automakers’ current position and a position they held in the past.D



(E) Evidence is provided that the new emissions legislation is both economically feasible and environmentally necessary.


该怎样解释D我不太明白,请NN明示



25.   Medical research findings are customarily not made public prior to their publication in a medical journal that has had them reviewed by a panel of experts in a process called peer review. It is claimed that this practice delays public access to potentially beneficial information that, in extreme instances, could save lives. Yet prepublication peer review is the only way to prevent erroneous and therefore potentially harmful information from reaching a public that is ill equipped to evaluate medical claims on its own. Therefore, waiting until a medical journal has published the research findings that have passed peer review is the price that must be paid to protect the public from making decisions based on possibly substandard research.



The argument assumes that



(A) unless medical research findings are brought to peer review by a medical journal, peer review will not occur



(B) anyone who does not serve on medical review panel does not have the necessary knowledge and expertise to evaluate medical research finding



(C) the general public does not have access to the medical journals in which research findings are published



(D) all medical research findings are subjected to prepublication peer review(A)



(E) peer review panels are sometimes subject to political and professional pressures that can make their judgments less than impartial


这道题我觉的自己始终没有把逻辑关系搞清楚,我选成B,我想错误原因是否是取非后反对THE ONLY WAY 的前提,请网上的朋友帮我把逻辑关系分析一下.谢谢




沙发
发表于 2004-5-13 01:52:00 | 只看该作者

24.PASSAGE的推理:在1970,汽车业反对CLEAN AIR ACT,说该ACT不可行,但一种67年发明的净化器的却使这个ACT可行。现在,汽车业要反对一个立法,说该立法不行-----所以,汽车业的看法不必重视。


作者是在用1970年的例子反对现在


25。是一个排除其他可能性的假设。


推理:研究成果公之于众之前的PEER REVIEW 是必须的------所以,必须由医学杂志公布PEER REVIEW的该研究成果。


排出其他可能:研究成果经PEERREVIEW却由其他杂志出版,同样起效果


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-13 1:53:55编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-2 01:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部