ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (CGLU)

00:00:00

A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4476|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道逻辑,研究了半天解释愣是没弄懂

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-29 23:20:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment.


Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.
(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.
(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment. A
(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-30 09:45:58 | 只看该作者
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment.

还是题干理解的问题吧,一群孩子听故事(was read),故事中牵扯的人物有故意伤害的也有无意伤害的;当问到如何惩罚这些造成伤害的人,年幼点的不会根据伤害是故意的还是无意的给予惩罚。
结论: 年幼的孩子不会把人的动机与相应的惩罚联系起来。

质疑实验是有问题的:因为讲故事的人和孩子的理解有所不同,也就是对故意或无意的表述有问题。。。
板凳
发表于 2010-9-30 10:21:41 | 只看该作者
答案是A吧 排除法,其他四个都无关
年纪小一些的孩子可能不能区分故事中的坏事是否是有意造成的
因此即使年纪小一些的孩子确实认为人们是否故意是相关因素,可是他们都去憋不出是否故意。如何依照是否故意给予惩罚呢
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-30 14:16:12 | 只看该作者
答案是A吧 排除法,其他四个都无关
年纪小一些的孩子可能不能区分故事中的坏事是否是有意造成的
因此即使年纪小一些的孩子确实认为人们是否故意是相关因素,可是他们都去憋不出是否故意。如何依照是否故意给予惩罚呢
-- by 会员 芷萱85 (2010/9/30 10:21:41)




答案A说的是听故事的人的做法,有此推出孩子们是可以辨别是不是有意的,所以结论说的孩子们给予惩罚与动机无关被削弱,是这个意思吗?
5#
发表于 2010-10-2 16:21:25 | 只看该作者
答案是A吧~
就是说讲故事的过程包含了对于造成伤害的人是有意还是无意的描述,
而更小的孩子可能无法从描述中准确推断当事人到底是有意还是无意,
因此他们是在不知道当事人有意还是无意的情况下做出了作何惩罚的决定,
因此不能说他们认为对于有意和无意的伤害给予的惩罚是无差别的~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-4 20:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部