ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space. So emission of these "greenhouse" gases contributes to global warming. In order to reduce global warming, emission of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced. Therefore, the methane now emitted from open landfills should instead be burned to produce electricity.Objection: The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.

Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection made to the proposal?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3476|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd逻辑题一道。求解。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-22 18:49:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Proposal:Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space.So emission of these “greenhouse” gases contributes to global warming.In order to reduce global warming, emission of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced. Therefore, the methane now emitted from open landfills should instead be burned to produce electricity.

Objection:The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.

Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection made to the proposal?



A.Every time a human being or other mammal exhales, there is some carbon dioxide released into the air.

B.The conversion of methane to electricity would occur at a considerable distance from the landfills.

C.The methane that is used to generate electricity would generally be used as a substitute for a fuel that does not produce any greenhouse gases when burned.

D.Methane in the atmosphere is more effective in blocking the escape of heat from the Earth than is carbon dioxide.

E.The amount of methane emitted from the landfills could be reduced if the materials whose decomposition produces methane were not discarded, but recycled.

答案是d。不是很明白。求解释~~~~~~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-8-22 19:20:05 | 只看该作者
题目说carbon和math 会造成温室效应 于是不应该释放math到空气中 而应该烧掉它来产生电能
objection说 math烧掉会产生carbon 意思就是烧不烧都一样 都得造成温室效应
问题是要找一个反对这个objection的选项
d的意思是carbon没有math造成的危害大 应该把math烧掉换成carbon 这样多少能减少一点危害 明白了吗?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-22 21:01:19 | 只看该作者
啊!谢谢楼上~~~明白了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 02:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部