ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2062|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全40-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-5 17:56:00 | 只看该作者

大全40-3

Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing efficiency in the world automobile industry. Some observers of Japan have assumed that Japanese firms use the same manufacturing equipment and techniques as United States firms but have benefited from the unique characteristics of Japanese employees and the Japanese culture. However, if this were true, then one would expect Japanese auto plants in the United States to perform no better than factories run by United States companies. This is not the case; Japanese-run automobile plants located in the United States and staffed by local workers have demonstrated higher levels of productivity when compared with factories owned by United States companies.

Other observers link high Japanese productivity to higher levels of capital investment per worker. But a historical perspective leads to a different conclusion. When the two top Japanese automobile makers matched and then doubled United States productivity levels in the mid-sixties, capital investment per employee was comparable to that of United States firms. Furthermore, by the late seventies, the amount of fixed assets required to produce one vehicle was roughly equivalent in Japan and in the United States.

Since capital investment was not higher in Japan, it had to be other factors that led to higher productivity. A more fruitful explanation may lie with Japanese production techniques. Japanese automobile producers did not simply implement conventional processes more effectively: they made critical changes in United States procedures. For instance, the mass-production philosophy of United States automakers encouraged the production of huge lots of cars in order to utilize fully expensive, component-specific equipment and to occupy fully workers who have been trained to execute one operation efficiently. Japanese automakers chose to make small-lot production feasible by introducing several departures from United States practices, including the use of flexible equipment that could be altered easily to do several different production tasks and the training of workers in multiple jobs. Automakers could schedule the production of different components or models on single machines, thereby eliminating the need to store the buffer stocks of extra components that result when specialized equipment and workers are kept constantly active.

3.     Which of the following statements concerning the productivity levels of automakers can be inferred from the passage?

(A) Prior to the 1960’s, the productivity levels of the top Japanese automakers were exceeded by those of United States automakers.

(B) The culture of a country has a large effect on the productivity levels of its automakers.

(C) During the late 1970’s and early 1980’s, productivity levels were comparable in Japan and the United States.

(D) The greater the number of cars that are produced in a single lot, the higher a plant’s productivity level.A

(E) The amount of capital investment made by automobile manufacturers in their factories determines the level of productivity.

答案是A

請高手解釋一下吧  小弟不是很了解


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-7 17:12:44编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-3-10 19:23:00 | 只看该作者

A, refers to When the two top Japanese automobile makers matched and then doubled United States productivity levels in the mid-sixties


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-10 19:23:47编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2007-6-30 22:33:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢楼上,这个定位很不明显。

地板
发表于 2009-7-26 15:10:00 | 只看该作者
how to infer
5#
发表于 2009-11-6 22:14:52 | 只看该作者
先是mathced 然后是doubled 说明之前是比美国的productivity 少的

所以选A
6#
发表于 2011-5-11 22:16:09 | 只看该作者
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
 (A) present the major steps of a process
 (B) clarify an ambiguity
 (C) chronicle a dispute
 (D) correct misconceptions
 (E) defend an accepted approach
第一题我就错了
我选了B
答案是D
我想了一下
文章说了一个现象,提出几个错误的解释,最后给出正确的解释
D比B好,因为不但有了clarify,还correct了

这样理解对吗?有没有更好的办法来想这道题?
7#
发表于 2015-3-16 10:17:44 | 只看该作者
取巧 发表于 2011-5-11 22:16
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to   (A) present the major steps of a process  (B ...

原文的misconception是:Japanese car makers are better because of the cultural advantage.
这里有了个misconception.

而ambiguity的英语解释是:Doubtfulness or uncertainty as regards interpretation.

我认为关键是misconception和ambiguity的区分。这是两个不一样的概念。原文中没有提到对什么不确定,对什么doubtfulness,只是说了日本汽车生产商做的更好是原因a,之后说不是,应该是b,然后又否定,说是c,这一系列都很明确说了概念,并不uncertain以及doubtful

部分内容借鉴cd论坛其他nn的论断,以及gmatclub讨论结果。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-4 01:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部