ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2520|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CR大全 Test 3 - 18 & 20

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-15 00:28:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.
Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.
Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward’s argument as a response to Teresa’s argument?
(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.
(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
(D) It does not meet Teresa’s point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa’s argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.

答案选D,我选的E,因为我考虑了economically。


The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

答案选E,这题没太看懂。请指教。~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-15 07:29:57 | 只看该作者
自己来顶一下。请大家来帮忙。~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-15 18:24:26 | 只看该作者
再顶~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-15 21:36:29 | 只看该作者
谁来帮忙解释一下呢?
5#
发表于 2010-8-15 22:15:23 | 只看该作者
第一题:T说送人去太空不可行 因为经济上不划算。
第二个人反驳,说人在卫星事故率很低。
E的话 其实整个对话都没有涉及什么national budget  
反驳之所以逻辑错误 是因为他光考虑了送上去以后很安全,但却没考虑送上去这个过程很花钱。这个花钱就是Impediment(D说的选项)

第二题
讲的是一种选人的方式。
当一个人要被提名后,必须先被告知其他被提名的人,然后再表示同意被提名。
题目说只有在被提名者 同意提名之后 才知道这些人是谁。
按照规则,流程是1.得知其他提名者 2 同意提名
因此 如果其他提名者是谁都不知道,那就无法完成第二步  也就是E所说的一个人都选不出来
题目本身比较绕 但ABCD选项很无关
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 02:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部