呵呵,我觉得论点应该是结论的同义词.
没有论据的结论,我觉得很奇怪!一个结论的成立,不需要建立在论据加论证的基础上吗?
所以我觉得这题的原文只是提供一些背景情况而已,选项就是要求我们用原文的背景当作论据来找可能产生的结论.而不是原文已经有了结论,看哪个选项和原文的结论一致.
Professional violinists are the only accepted judges of the sound quality of violins.
Would be the best supported by those statements?
(D) It is currently impossible to construct a violin that the only accepted judges will evaluate as having improved sound.
(E) It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professional violinists.
我的想法:原文说Professional violinists的观点是唯一可被接受,E说一种可能是rofessional violinists跟其他人的观点都不同.没说其他人的观点也被接受了,因此并没有否认或者反对原文的背景.而且原文没说Professional violinists跟其他人的观点必然一致,因此E的可能性是可以成立的.
至于D,虽然每个字都是原文出现过的,但是,这不表示它一定正确.比如有这样一个选项:
A violin constructed to sound different from the best-sounding existing violins would have improved sound .
这句话的每个字都在原文里出现过,只是调换了一下位置而已,但你能说这句子能被原文支持吗?D跟这句子差不多,就是把原文的字的位置换了一下,但无法有合理的逻辑推理出来.请指教! |