ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2526|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG10 79

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-24 16:36:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
79. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.



Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?

(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?

(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?A

(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

那位大牛能帮忙解释下这题
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-26 16:34:49 | 只看该作者
我也不明白这个,看OG的解释,看到一坨坨的,有人可以解释一下吗?
板凳
发表于 2010-4-26 16:54:41 | 只看该作者
我认为:
句子的意思是 ,当被催眠者被施以聋子的命令后,他们回答 No 当催眠师问他们是否听的到

有些专家解释说 被催眠的对象被分成不同的部分,回答和被催眠为聋子的 不是一个部分

但是按照专家解释的逻辑:如果回答和催眠为聋子不是一个部分的话,回答应该回答 Yes,而不是No

所以选A
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-27 13:40:21 | 只看该作者
感谢楼上,我现在也明白这个题的意思啦
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 05:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部