大全-1-5

littlepigmm · 发表于 2010-4-19 01:34:38

大全-1-5. Psychological research indicates thatcollege hockey and football players are more quickly moved to hostility andaggression than are college athletes in noncontact sports such as swimming. Butthe researchers’ conclusion—that contact sports encourage and teachparticipants to be hostile and aggressive—is untenable. The football and hockeyplayers were probably more hostile and aggressive to start with than theswimmers.
Which of the following, if true, wouldmost strengthen the conclusion drawn by the psychological researchers?
(A) Thefootball and hockey players became more hostile and aggressive during theseason and remained so during the off-season, whereas there was no increase inaggressiveness among the swimmers.
(B) Thefootball and hockey players, but not the swimmers, were aware at the start ofthe experiment that they were being tested for aggressiveness.
(C) The samepsychological research indicated that the football and hockey players had agreat respect for cooperation and team play, whereas the swimmers were mostconcerned with excelling as individual competitors.
(D) Theresearch studies were designed to include no college athletes who participatedin both contact and noncontact sports.（A）
(E) Throughoutthe United States
,more incidents of fan violence occur at baseball games than occur at hockey orfootball games.

为什么A 对呢？Ａ不是说明　心理研究者要反驳的结论是对的么？

ellie78 · 发表于 2010-4-19 08:47:19

心理学家说玩冰球和橄榄球的运动员比其他项目运动员更hostile,反方说是因为运动本身很hostile。strengthen后面的观点，只要能加强“人本身不hostile，是运动hostile”，就行。
A说冰球和橄榄球运动员在赛季更hostile，可以构成他因消弱心理学家的理论，从而加强了反方观点。
我是这么选的，呵呵~还望牛人指正~

martycai · 发表于 2010-4-25 12:19:47

我也不明白。
好像A说冰球和橄榄球运动员一开始比赛就变得(became)很暴力，而且比赛好了都变不会去了。

大全-1-5

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()