ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2280|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 76选对了 但还是不理解·~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-22 18:34:48 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?



According to experts on shopping behavior, more shoppers would shop at Jerrod’s department store if they were offered the convenience of shopping carts.In fact, even if the amount spent by these additional customers only just covered the cost of providing the carts, providing carts would still probably increase Jerrod’s profits, since _______.

A. the layout of Jerrod’s is open enough to accommodate shopping carts comfortably

B. several department stores that compete with Jerrod’s have begun to make shopping carts available to their customers

C. there are some potential customers who would not be enticed to shop at Jerrod’s by the availability of shopping carts

D. stores that make shopping carts available to customers usually have to hire people to retrieve them from parking areas

E. a customer with a shopping cart buys more, on average, than a customer without a cart



排除法得的E,E说有cart的比没cart的平均买的多。原文不是说了这些有cart的消费者买的东西的价值和送cart的钱一样多吗?这样不就和E矛盾了》?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-22 19:43:01 | 只看该作者
原文说的是从商场的角度说的~~而E答案是从顾客的角度说的,多买会给商场带来效益,那么offer 的carts数量是一定的,但大家买的东西越来越多了,渐渐地商场因为cart盈利的钱就会超过offer carts的成本~~不矛盾
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-19 13:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部