- UID
- 491157
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-11-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Until mow, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
B. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.
C. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
D. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
E. The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.
选d，为什么d选项取非后削弱呢？
成人得Inf是因为小孩得Inf ，这个条件能削弱没有健康利益能从广泛使用新的疫苗得到吗？ |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-3-8 16:40:35
收藏
收藏
楼主
