ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2248|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【求助GWD两道题~】

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-16 11:51:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-8-Q22:
When storing Renaissance oil paintings, museums conform to standards that call for careful control of the surrounding temperature and humidity, with variations confined within narrow margins. Maintaining this environment is very costly, and recent research shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity. Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Renaissance paintings were created in conditions involving far greater fluctuations in temperature and humidity than those permitted by current standards.
B. Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.
C. Museum collections typically do not contain items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings.
D. None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.
E. Most Renaissance oil paintings are stored in museums located in regions near the regions where the paintings were created.
答案是D,None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint是什么意思?D选项是不是就是说油画中没有受温度和湿度影响的物质?可是文中不是已经说了even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity,这样岂不是重复了?

GWD-8-Q38:
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival
答案是E,我选的是A,文章说Extinct?ban hunting, conclusion: ban hunting?not extinct.那么,A为什么不可以呢?A不就是削弱了Ban hunting的作用么?


谢谢大家~~帮帮忙吧~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-16 19:16:19 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下~
板凳
发表于 2010-2-16 21:26:55 | 只看该作者
22  D. None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.
除了paint(油料)文艺复兴时的油画中没有材料都敏感温度和湿度的波动会损坏油画的程度。和你的理解一样
关键是even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity中的old oil paint是一种油料 而不是painting
地板
发表于 2010-2-16 21:31:18 | 只看该作者
Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
就是说   国家成功地推行了这些法规(禁止tiger hunting)=>确保野生老虎的生存
逻辑错误在这个推到的逻辑链上 就是要标明禁止捕猎老虎不一定能ensure老虎的生存 也许还有其他的因素

a的错误在于和text的内容相悖 已经给出if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation了
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-16 22:18:28 | 只看该作者



恩,明白啦,谢谢!~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-4 20:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部