求助

meckychen · 发表于 2009-11-25 21:11:35

In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania’s claim?

A. Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania’s movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year.

B. Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.

C. Moviemania’s customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.

D. Total attendance at Moviemania’s movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.

E. The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.

答案：A

我不是很明白问题-most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania’s claim的意思，麻烦帮我分析一下。

moonlolita · 发表于 2009-11-25 21:17:08

问题问的就是，怎么帮助反对者更有力的反对M公司自己的申明（Moviemania saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales，就是换成CO油损害了他卖爆米花的销量）
所以说就是要证明M公司的爆米花销量实际上上升了

求助

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()