ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1609|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家来试试这道题练习一下思维

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-22 21:42:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
选自LSAT Section IV -22

All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very nearsighted. So I must be a genius.

Which one of the following exhibits both of the logical flaws exhibited in the argument above?

A. I must be a stupid because all intelligent people are nearsighted and I have perfect eyesight.
B. All chickens have beaks. This bird has a beak. So this bird must be a chicken.
C. All pigs have four legs, but this spider has eight legs. So this spider must be twice as big as any pig.
D. John is extremely happy, so he must be extremely tall because all tall people are happy.
E. All geniuses are very nearsighted. I must be very nearsighted since I am a genius.

[D] is the correct answer. Let's discuss why.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-11-22 22:29:08 | 只看该作者
The logical flaws of this argument are:
First,"all intelligent people are nearsighted" cannot be interpreted as "if people are nearsighted, they are intelligent". Because we know "If A, then B" cannot draw "If B, then A".
Second, there is no positive correlation between the degree of "nearsighted" and the that of "intelligent".

Let's look at the answers:
A) "If intelligent, then nearsighted." can be decoded as "If not nearsighted, then not intelligent". (contra-positive)
    eliminated
B) only contains the first logical flaw
    eliminated
C) "So the spider must be twice as big as any pig" shows the comparison of the size which is irrelevant.
    eliminated
D) "All tall people are happy" = If tall, then happy
    "John is extremely happy, so he must be extremely tall" = If extremely happy, then extremely tall"
    EXACTLY SAME AS THE ABOVE ARGUMENT!!!
E)  only contains the first logical flaw
    eliminated

What's ur opinions?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-22 22:38:48 | 只看该作者
First flaw in the argument is that the author mistook "necessary condition A<=B" for "sufficient condition A=>B". I agree with you.
Thanks for your explanation about the second flaw.. Initially I just got some feeling about "degree" but I didn't have confidence that it is a flaw. Now I fully agree with you.. thanks..
地板
发表于 2009-11-22 23:51:08 | 只看该作者
别客气,你几号三战呀?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 11:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部