ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4426|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

feifei 10 求教~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-9 13:55:00 | 只看该作者

feifei 10 求教~

10. In order to pressure the government of Country S to become less repressive, some legislators in Country R want to ban all exports from R to S. Companies in R that manufacture telecommunication equipment such as telephones and fax machines have argued that exports of their products should be exempted from the ban, on the ground that it is impossible for a country to remain repressive when telecommunication equipment is widely available to the population of that country.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument given by the manufacturers depends?
(A) The government of S has recently increased the amount of telecommunication equipment it allows to be imported into the country.
(B) The telecommunication equipment that would be imported into S if the exemption were to be granted would not be available solely to top development officials in S.
(C) A majority of the members of R’s legislature do not favor exempting telecommunication equipment from the ban on exports to Country S.
(D) Of all exports that could be sent to Country S, telecommunication equipment would be the most effective in helping citizens of S oppose that country’s repressive government.
(E) Without pressure from Country R, the government of S would be able to continue repressing its citizens indefinitely.

答案是C

我选的是D  我觉得意思是因为通讯设备可以给S国的公民带来信息,从而而已更好的压制S国的政府 是不是D的错误是处在most effective上啊

欢迎指点啊~~

沙发
发表于 2008-10-9 17:33:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得d是无关项.

该题与r的政策出于什么目的无关.

gap在于c,即,因为r立法不赞成通讯设备的出口.因此才会有题中要求对通讯设备出口的豁免.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-10 08:58:00 | 只看该作者

好像有点懂了 但逻辑还是不太明白

再问问下

on the ground that it is impossible for a country to remain repressive when telecommunication equipment is widely available to the population of that country.

这句话的逻辑我还是不太明白

地板
发表于 2008-10-10 13:00:00 | 只看该作者

问的问题是,为啥要讨论啊。。。。。。

答案很明确,就是有人不同意,不赞成,所以要讨论啊。。所以选c...

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-10 19:09:00 | 只看该作者

 on the ground that it is impossible for a country to remain repressive when telecommunication equipment is widely available to the population of that country.

楼上说的是个总体的思路吧

我想问问看的是 那个运营商说的这句话到底什么逻辑呢,如果翻译成要压迫一个国家就不能对那个国家的人民开放通讯设备的话,那这个运营商不是在搬石头砸自己的脚么~~

恳请各位赐教~~谢谢啦

6#
发表于 2008-10-10 19:11:00 | 只看该作者

为啥我那个版本的答案是B

对这道题目我也很迷茫

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-10 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

你是什么版本啊~ 

希望有个大牛出来帮帮忙啊 月底就考了

8#
发表于 2008-11-4 20:23:00 | 只看该作者
确实我 的答案啊也是B
9#
发表于 2008-11-5 00:17:00 | 只看该作者

应该选B  取非削弱。 换言之,原文说的是telecommunication会让 S less repressive, 那么假如telecommunication不仅仅局限在某一个群体的话 其实就是说会在整个S产生这种影响

C 我认为是无关项

10#
发表于 2008-11-5 02:24:00 | 只看该作者

的确是B,conclusion:应该要豁免对这些器材的禁止出口  支持的原因是:不普及这些电信通讯手段,S国人民就无法摆脱受压制的状态-->X

而B正是桥梁,解除禁运,带来S国上层阶层不再专有信息通讯-->普及了电信通讯-->X--->Conclusion

C是无关选项

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 20:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部