p2-rc 17.久久纠结不能自拔

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.  However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.  Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.  Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

现在只有standard-height tables

顾客喜欢tall tables with stools，坐stools的顾客比做standard-height tables的顾客呆的时间要短

→因此如果把一些椅子换成high tables and stools，利润将提高

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available

(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals

(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering

(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer

(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

答案是C

啊啊啊啊啊啊啊，

怎么都想不通，连C的意思也不太明白

D  怎么不对了？

是不是题目

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

  it gives reason 使得D不对，因为文中并没有说道这点，而C与the generalization about lingering有关？

prep的答案有木有可能错啊

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

  it gives reason 使得D不对，因为文中并没有说道这点，而C与the generalization about lingering有关？

prep的答案有木有可能错啊

明白啦，确实是提问没读懂，thx，thx