ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2422|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-I-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-14 01:05:00 | 只看该作者

大全-I-3

Economies in which a high percentage of resources are invested in research and development show greater growth in the long run than do those in which resources are channeled into consumption. Japanese workers spend a higher percentage of their income investing in research and development than do American workers.



To grow as fast as Japan has in the past three decades, the United States must change the tax code in order to encourage savings and investment and discourage debt.



Which of the following, if true, tends to weaken the argument?



(A) Japanese research is more focused on consumers than is research by American firms.



(B) Class mobility, highly valued in American culture, is encouraged by a growing rather than a stagnant economy.



(C) Studies have shown that countries with high consumption rates prosper in the short run.



(D) Proposed changes to the tax code could involve strict limits on the deductability of interest, and increased allowance for research.E



(E) Because a decreasing percentage of the United States is under 40, an age when savings are traditionally low, the savings rate will increase without changes to the tax code.

  

按照答案E的说法,的确可以增加存款。但是题目问的是weaken the argument,E里面根本就没有提到前面所谓的investing in research and development ,因为存款增加并不意味着投资增加。比如中国人的存款多得很,但是投资的却很少。那么E根本就与argument无关,只是削弱了结论。这该如何解释?


沙发
发表于 2004-3-14 09:35:00 | 只看该作者

The concusion is to increase saving and investment by CHANGING TAX CODE, however Choice E indicates that saving rates can be increased without changes to the tax code.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 07:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部