ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Junior biomedical researchers have long assumed that their hirings and promotions depend significantly on the amount of their published work. People responsible for making hiring and promotion decisions in the biomedical research field, however, are influenced much more by the overall impact that a candidate's scientific publications have on his or her field than by the number of those publications.

The information above, if accurate, argues most strongly against which of the following claims?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1875|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助!07prep cr 86

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-9-5 10:18:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
还有几天就考试了逻辑依然渣一样的。。。紧急求助啊!!!
Junior biomedical researchers have long assumed that their hirings and promotions depend significantly on the amount of their published work.  People responsible for making hiring and promotion decisions in the biomedical research field, however, are influenced much more by the overall impact that a candidate's scientific publications have on his or her field than by the number of those publications.

The information above, if accurate, argues most strongly against which of the following claims?

A. Even biomedical researchers who are just beginning their careers are expected already to have published articles of major significance to the field.
B. Contributions to the field of biomedical research are generally considered to be significant only if the work is published.
C. The potential scientific importance of not-yet-published work is sometimes taken into account in decisions regarding the hiring or promotion of biomedical researchers.
D. People responsible for hiring or promoting biomedical researchers can reasonably be expected to make a fair assessment of the overall impact of a candidate's publications on his or her field.
E. Biomedical researchers can substantially increase their chances of promotion by fragmenting their research findings so that they are published in several journals instead of one.



答案给E,我对B不能释怀啊,如果发了论文才有贡献,那雇佣方所谓的按照impact来做决定不就还是按照是否发论文来决定吗?E选项也不太能理解……

诚信诚意的求解答!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-9-6 11:10:45 | 只看该作者
此题我一开始也有同样的困惑。。后来是这样想的。。演绎推理题,凡是答案文中没有提到的信息都是错的。。文中说的是:"hiring and promotion are influenced much more by by the overall impact that a candidate's scientific publications have on his or her field than by the number of those publications.",即强调的是hiring and promotion ,B只是在说 contributions to the field..所以跟题目没有联系啊。而E 研究学家们通过将他们的论文研究分段发表来增加他们提升的机会。。意思是他们在重视发表的数量。。正好与文中说到的相反。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-6 11:14:05 | 只看该作者
小猪快跑莉 发表于 2014-9-6 11:10
此题我一开始也有同样的困惑。。后来是这样想的。。演绎推理题,凡是答案文中没有提到的信息都是错的。。文 ...

明白啦!!!谢啦谢啦!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 10:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部