大全-20-13

Tira · 发表于 2007-4-21 18:13:00

13 Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?
(A) Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.
(B) During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.
(C) Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.
(D) Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.
(E) Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinio。
要加强的话应该是要指出广告对于选民确实有影响才是啊为什么C是答案呢

Tira · 发表于 2007-4-22 10:04:00

问题很弱吗自己顶一下

pangpangshin · 发表于 2007-4-22 23:02:00

我的理解是

题目 W通过广告影响选民的观点=》p b存在偏见

加强：W采用的广告确实影响选民

C W反对的PP无时间做广告

从而加强W的广告对选民有影响

anzhiying · 发表于 2009-8-4 21:42:00

这题我也不懂。怎么觉得C是weaken呢？请指教

大全-20-13

大全-20-13

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()