ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3462|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

feifei 逻辑94 有点难度

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-31 12:34:13 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
94. When 100 people who have not used cocaine are tested for cocaine use, on average only 5 will test positive. By contrast, of every 100 people who have used cocaine 99 will test positive. Thus, when a randomly chosen group of people is tested for cocaine use, the vast people is tested for cocaine use, the vast majority of those who test positive will be people who have used cocaine.



A reasoning error in the argument is that the argument



A.       attempts to infer a value judgment from purely factual premises

B.        attributes to every member of the population the properties of the average member of the population

C.        fails to take into account what proportion of the population have used cocaine

D.       ignores the fact that some cocaine users do not test positive

E.        advocates testing people for cocaine use when there is no reason to suspect that they have used cocaine



答案C



费费详解里我看不太明白。

请大家能否用通俗易懂的方式说明一下。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-1 00:10:58 | 只看该作者

hello

简单的讲就是测试人群不确定,如果全部都是没有用过可卡因的人参加测试,那么“the vast majority of those who test positive will be people who have used cocaine. ”就不对了,因为根本就没有人用过可卡因
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-4 06:05:42 | 只看该作者
谢谢你的回复。

主要不太理解以下这句话的机构和意思。能否请你说detail一些。

以下这句话的主语到底是哪个嘞?

Thus, when a randomly chosen group of people is tested for cocaine use, the vast people is tested for cocaine use, the vast majority of those who test positive will be people who have used cocaine.
地板
发表于 2010-10-10 22:08:48 | 只看该作者
弱弱的问,选项B是什么意思?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 12:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部