ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1150|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

紫皮og11-46

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-20 10:00:00 | 只看该作者

紫皮og11-46

Bank depositors in the United Staes are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failure. If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

46. Which of the following, if ture, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?

(A) Before the government started to insure depositors against bank failure, there was a lower rate of bank failure than there is now.

(B) When the government did not insure deposits, frequent bank failures occurred as a result of depositors' fears of losing money in bank failures.

(C) Surveys show tha a significant proportion of depositors are aware that their deposits are insured by the governemt.

(D) There is an upper limit on the amount of an individual's deposit that the government will insure, but very few individuals' deposits exceed this limit.

(E) The security of a bank against failure depends on the percentage of its assets that are loaned out and also on how much risk its loans involve. 

Situation:   An economist contends that the high rate of bank failures can partly be blamed on federal insurance of bank deposits. The insurance removes any financial incentive for depositors to seek those banks that are the most secure against failure. In the absence of more selective depositors, the banks need not be secure to compete for deposits.(我总觉得这句话不对吧,好像和原文意思相反啊。)

答案选:B


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-20 10:06:04编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-4-21 00:10:00 | 只看该作者
没有问题啊

政府提供保障,存款者不用更多的去比较各家银行,从而选择一家安全性高的~~~所以削弱了银行的提升自己竞争力的动力
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 02:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部