ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7382|回复: 29
打印 上一主题 下一主题

快考了,帮忙看道管为东小班的真题,谢了

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-20 17:28:00 | 只看该作者

快考了,帮忙看道管为东小班的真题,谢了

27Last August the XT chain of gasoline stations had a temporary sales promotion in effectIn the promotion , any customer who made a purchase of ten or more gallons of gasoline was entitled to a tree car wash . For the month of August , XT experienced a ten percent increase in gasoline sales as compared to sales in August the previous year .so


evidently the promotion was successful as a means of boosting sales .


In evaluating the argument , it would be most helpful to answer which of the following ?



1.In the areas in which XT’s gasoline stations operate , how did total combined


gasoline sales for all gasoline stations last August compare with sales for the


previous August?



2.Was the money that XT earned from the increase in gasoline sales enough to


offset the cost of providing tree car washes during the promotion?



3.Were there any customers who bought ten or more gallons at an XT gasoline


station during the promotion who would have or more gallons at an XT gasoline


in lower quantities , but more frequently ,if the promotion had not been in effect?



4.Did XT or any or its gasoline stations have to pay other businesses to provide


   the car washes that customers were offered in the promotion?



5.Are XT’s gasoline sales in August usually significantly higher than one twelfth of


XT’s annual gasoline sales ?

沙发
发表于 2005-11-20 20:10:00 | 只看该作者

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-22 11:38:34编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2005-11-20 20:45:00 | 只看该作者

5th is right

地板
发表于 2005-11-20 20:59:00 | 只看该作者

答案是A。


注意原文是 the XT chain of gasoline stations ,不是gasoline stations ,部分不能代表整体。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-20 23:11:00 | 只看该作者

淡蓝色的回忆多谢回复,有几问. 我觉得,ca 好。a是对总体的描述,与个体无关。c则表示促销无效。人们只是少买几次,但多卖量。总体不变。

6#
发表于 2005-11-21 00:16:00 | 只看该作者

如果将C中的


3.Were there any customers who bought ten or more gallons at an XT gasoline


station during the promotion who would have or more gallons at an XT gasoline


in lower quantities , but more frequently ,if the promotion had not been in effect?


改为many,则应该选择C


如果原题没有many, 就只有选A(因为选A附加了某些推理假设)。

7#
发表于 2005-11-21 00:17:00 | 只看该作者

如果将C中的any改为many,则应该选择C


3.Were there any customers(注意这里是复数) who bought ten or more gallons at an XT gasoline


station during the promotion who would have or more gallons at an XT gasoline


in lower quantities , but more frequently ,if the promotion had not been in effect?



如果原题没有many, 就只有选A(因为选A附加了某些推理假设)。

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-21 01:03:00 | 只看该作者
howardwang, 谢谢,同意,c是由有点问题,不过,考试时肯定中,太细了。A一看就排出了。总体怎么样,与个体无关。
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-21 12:37:00 | 只看该作者
Howardwang,可以解释一下A为什么对吗?我后来一想,如果C的答案是 否,一定支持,如果是 是,有一点否定的作用(只是一点)。但a无关阿
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-21 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since
A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

请问牛牛,那个是答案。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 08:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部