ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

If the airspace around centrally located airports were restricted to commercial airliners and only those private planes equipped with radar, most of the private-plane traffic would be forced to sue outlying airfields. Such a reduction in the amount of private-plane traffic would reduce the risk of midair collision around the centrally located airports.

The conclusion drawn in the first sentence depends on which of the following assumptions?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2059|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og-36 新问题 请nn.

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-30 23:38:00 | 只看该作者

og-36 新问题 请nn.

请教OG-36


If the airspace around centrally located airports were restricted to commercial airliners and only those private planes equipped with radar, most of the private-plane traffic would be forced to sue outlying airfields.

>>

The conclusion draw in the first sentence depends on which of the following assumptions?>>


>>


A. Outlying airfields would be as convenient as centrally located airports for most pilots of private planes.>>


B. Most outlying airfields are not equipped to handle commercial-airline traffic.>>


C. Most private planes that use centrally located airports are not equipped with radar.


D. Commercial airliners are at greater risk of becoming involved in midair collisions than are private planes.


E. A reduction in the risk of midair collision would eventually lead to increases in commercial-airline traffic.



答案没问题 :问  若 Most of the private-plane are not commericial airliners. 是不是也可以算成是答案。。 

沙发
发表于 2006-5-1 01:36:00 | 只看该作者
I think private planes are not commercial planes by definition.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-1 11:42:00 | 只看该作者
do you mean :  commercial airliners and only those private planes   is diffirent things,  so it has been definition.. ?
地板
发表于 2006-5-1 11:50:00 | 只看该作者
I meant commerical airliners and private planes cannot be the same thing, so the condition that "most of the private-plane are not commericial airliners" will be a restatement of the obvious, not an assumption that one has to make.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-1 12:55:00 | 只看该作者

哦,i know。 i am wrong in understanding the meaning of commercial airliners


commericial airliners :商业客机 (大家的)


private-plane 私人飞机。


thank you very much!

6#
发表于 2006-5-1 13:12:00 | 只看该作者
Exactly!  Glad to be of help, =)
7#
发表于 2006-7-28 22:29:00 | 只看该作者

应该算是无关选项吧!虽然取非可以削弱。与OG-8的E项相似

8#
发表于 2008-4-24 16:54:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得不算,因为 就算outlying airfields可以适合商用飞机,那和risk of midair collision around the centrally
located airports关系也不大,题目也没明确讲
centrally
located airports很拥挤之类的,只是因为有没雷达的问题
9#
发表于 2009-2-24 03:11:00 | 只看该作者
题干说:如果CENTRAL AIRPORT只停COMMERCIAL 和有RADAR的PRIVATE,那么大多数PRIVATE PLANES就会停到OUTLYING AIRPORT。COMMERICAL是无关的,争论的焦点在于PRIVATE有没有雷达,是它是否能停在CENTRAL的标准。所以关键词是PRIVATE和RADAR。个人理解,NN们多指正。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 14:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部