Come on yaoyao99, I give you an example, if one plan to apply HBS, Columbia, Wharton and Chicago. (Let's assume he really want to get in HBS or Wharton)
R1 HBS, Chicago, if the guy gets admission from Chicago, so he has to reject it then apply for Wharton and Columbia for R2? Assumption here is he does not have enough time to handle 4 schools together for R1 so he has to apply in 2+2 fassion.
anyone has rejected top schools for R1? then bear the risk to apply other schools(maybe the ones he is more intersted) for R2?
The risk here is if the guy get both rejected in R2, he looses everything, including Chicago which gave him the admission. Sigh...
anyone has rejected top schools for R1? then bear the risk to apply other schools(maybe the ones he is more intersted) for R2?
If he is interested more in the schools to be applied in R2 than those in R1, why not applying the R2 schools in R1? Otherwise the strategy sounds illogical.
Well, such is life. You can't place your bets after you've seen all the cards. It's up to you to decide what you are willing to risk for the grant prize. Think of it as a good opportunity to sharpen your risk management, planning, organization, and prioritization skills.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-8-1 10:58:00
楼主
